Q: Are you a holocaust denier?
A: Assuming of course that you are referring to the Jewish holocaust under Nazi
Germany; no, I have reviewed the evidence, both the evidence presented by the Allied powers and the anti-holocaust evidence presented by the Axis Powers and neo-Nazi movements.
I don’t find the anti-holocaust evidence credible so I don’t see a reason why
anyone should deny the Jewish holocaust. As far as I have understood; Nazi
Germany didn’t originally want to annihilate the Jews. They were considering
deportation but they didn’t really have any location to deport them to, and
they weren’t offered any location by the allied forces. They didn’t start
massacring the Jews until after they realised that they were losing the war
and the window of opportunity was closing fast (after the failed
Russian invasion in1941). I guess, they used the following logic; they felt they had to cut out what they viewed as a cancer before they lost the war somewhat like
many Serbs did during the Balkan war. They wanted to deport but as their
adversaries made that impossible they chose the only solution (according to
their logic). No one should try to justify genocide, it is a bad thing that
cannot or should not be excused. There are always other options.
So Anders Behring Breivik is a Holocaust believer? Let's review what he is saying.
1. He claims that has reviewed the evidence and by that the evidence presented by "Allied powers", "Axis powers" and "neo-Nazi movements". Now that's hardly unbiased sources. Wouldn't one rather look at the evidence presented by forensic experts, archeologists and historians that studied and investigated the primary sources?
2. For someone that claims that he as "reviewed the evidence" it is funny to make statements like:
All the Encyclopedias and National Geographic agree that Hindu Kush region is a
place of Hindu genocide (similar to Dakau and Auschwitz).
... as the places and camps name is Dachau about which no orthodox historian would claim that it was an extermination camp. Facts that Anders Breivik seems to be clueless about
3. Further more Breivik claims that "Nazis killed 300,000 gypsies in the gas chambers". Now what evidence for that did he review? I am asking because nobody until now has ever presented any evidence for "gypsy: gassings.
4. As a matter of note it is not the Holocaust Revisionists that need to come up with Holocaust evidence. It suffices to show that the evidence (or lack thereof) for the Holocaust doesn't make for the case. The burden of proof is on those that make an accusation.
This allows only one conclusion. Breivik has never reviewed the evidence seriously at most he did browse over what has been said on several web sites. In all fairness it should however be noted that he's right about the deportation. The claim that "the Nazis started massacering the Jews, when they realised, they were loosing the war" is however redigest orthodox Holocaust lore.
But it continues:
My problem with holocaust denial however is the European cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elite’s refusal to acknowledge the Christian,
Hindu, Buddhist, Zoroastrian genocides by the hand of the Islamic Ummah.
Islam has systematically slaughtered more than 300 million people since its
creation and this trend is continuing every year (see the continuation of
the Assyrian, Coptic, Maronite, Hindu genocides in the Middle East). The
politically correct elites of the EUSSR/USASSR are the true holocaust
deniers as they refuse to acknowledge current and historical Islamic atrocities.
Furthermore, while I oppose deniers of the Jewish holocaust I realise that
the “holocaust religion” is an extremely destructive force in Europe. Today,
European youths are systematically brainwashed and made into pacifist
eunuchs (school classes being bussed to former concentration camps and
taught to reject their culture, pride etc.). Our elites, backed by the
EUSSR/USASSR cultural hegemony, are stripping away any sense of pride
and honor from European youths in a deliberate scheme to feminise/pacify them in
order to prevent future Nazi movements from emerging. The problem here is
that we are left with little to none cultural defenses against any force
which would want to conquer us.
This is why the Islamic Ummah have been taken advantage of our lack of cultural
defenses and are currently colonising us, facilitated by our traitorous cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist elites. The “holocaust religion” has grown into
a destructive anti-European monster, which prevents nationalistic doctrines
from emerging. And without nationalistic doctrines, Europe will wither and
die, which we are seeing today. It’s quite ironic that Even Israel would
appear to have become a victim of it. Needless to say, while I am a strong supporter of Israel and of all patriotic Jews I acknowledge that the
anti-European holocaust religion must be deconstructed, and instead replaced
with an anti-Islamic version. After all we are talking about a disproportion
of 6 million killed Jews vs. 300 million massacred
Jews/Christians/Hindus/Buddhists/Zoroastrians/Animists.
As of now, the “holocaust religion” is one of the major factors that are making Europe vulnerable and susceptible for Islamic conquest through demographical
warfare.
Breivik links the Holocaust to alleged extermination activities of Muslims against non-Muslims. As his opposition against muslims was the motivation behind the violence he committed. I'd assess that his Holocaust believe contributed to his willingness to kill people.
Despite being clearly still under the sway of the Holocaust note that Breivik is, while being a Holocaust believer, intelligent enough to see what role Holocaust Dogma plays in Western societies.
